Memebag, yes I'm aware of that fact, however windows 8 metro apps will run in either arm or Intel as I understand it. It includes remote desktop so I can remote into my x86 if I want to run an app on there.
Sent from my Lumia 900 using Board Express
"Metro" has been removed from the lexicon. They are Windows RT apps now. Those apps (compiled to ARM) can be run on Windows 8 (the Intel one) in an emulator.
(iPads and Android tablets have remote desktop, too.)
Remember, this is a Windows RT product. You will only be able to run apps built for Windows RT, not regular Windows 8 apps. They will look very similar, but under the covers there is a whole different CPU and instruction set.
I know metro was removed, not sure what else to call it, but you get my point. The point is developers can target metro and it will run on either platform. That's a big advantage for software developers.
All indications from most techno blogs is that MS is having a tough time convincing developers to jump on board. Many of them are being very cautious to go this route, because next year MS might pull the plug on the whole thing if it doesn't catch on.
Like you guys I am hopeful that it does well. I think the more players the better!
I know metro was removed, not sure what else to call it, but you get my point. The point is developers can target metro and it will run on either platform. That's a big advantage for software developers.
You can call them Windows RT apps; that seems to be what Microsoft is calling them now.
As a software developer, I'll wait and see how successful the emulation is and how successful the hardware is. No point targeting a tablet that no one owns, and making an app work well with a mouse and a touchscreen is non-trivial.
It isn't just that they are late to the game; it's the whole idea that desktop and mobile hardware should share a user interface. We interact with them in very different ways, so trying to unify the interface seems questionable.
It isn't just that they are late to the game; it's the whole idea that desktop and mobile hardware should share a user interface. We interact with them in very different ways, so trying to unify the interface seems questionable.
There's a pretty cool video of the making of the surface on this article. The entire article is a good read for those that are into what it takes to make a world class product:
Under the Surface: an inside look at how Microsoft's tablet came to be | The Verge
The surface is so sturdy, Microsoft attached 4 wheels to it and Stephen Sinofshky rode it like a skateboard:
http://mashable.com/2012/10/17/microsoft-surface-skateboard/
I appreciate this kind of quality in a product.
https://twitter.com/stevesi/status/258304210272133120
I'm typing this from winows 8
You obviously have not installed the 'D' key add on to windows 8.
Looks like surface pre-orders have sold out in all packages. If you really want one on Launch day, you have the option to go to a Microsoft store from now until the day before launch an get a reservation ticket to guarantee you get one on launch day in the store. The catch is you have to bring your reservation ticket by noon on launch day to make sure you get it.
That sounds like a nice option, no standing in line over night, just get a ticket and show up when the store opens.
Initial Surface US pre-orders sold out, some UK orders delayed to November 2nd | The Verge
No they need to be making people stand in line for a week so news medias will cover it and make it their lead news story. This tickets and pre-orders don't generate the same hype.
Alternatively - when people aren't sleeping in front of Microsoft stores (which I've never heard of) they can point to the tickets as an explanation.