Are you seeing a huge difference with the wing -vs- the spoiler? I find it kinda funny that so many callers to NASCAR radio could see such a huge difference in the way the car handled. At the same time, almost every driver that I heard interviewed, when asked about the spoiler said the difference is nothing more than cosmetic. I guess we all see what we want to see. :idunno:
I can remember that when the COT debuted, all of the announcers were so quick to point out quickly the car would snap back into shape when it got sideways with that wing. Now they talk about the added down-force that the spoiler has -vs- the wing. Which is it? It can't go both ways.
At least we don't have to worry about cars becoming airborne any more. We all know that was a direct result of the wing. I only say this as the proud graduate of the School of Aeronautics, Class of 92'. How about you? They can probably add a little more to the diameter of that restrictor plate now that that's been resolved. I wonder what will get the blame the next time it happens. :scratch:
Now, if we could just do something about that damn splitter. :ignore:
I can remember that when the COT debuted, all of the announcers were so quick to point out quickly the car would snap back into shape when it got sideways with that wing. Now they talk about the added down-force that the spoiler has -vs- the wing. Which is it? It can't go both ways.
At least we don't have to worry about cars becoming airborne any more. We all know that was a direct result of the wing. I only say this as the proud graduate of the School of Aeronautics, Class of 92'. How about you? They can probably add a little more to the diameter of that restrictor plate now that that's been resolved. I wonder what will get the blame the next time it happens. :scratch:
Now, if we could just do something about that damn splitter. :ignore: