Political Talk Forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
But if Kathy does get arrested, then she should appear on OITNB tons of lesbian sex.

every man's fantasy is a sex scene between these two:

WORLDS-MOST-DISGUSTING-WHORE-KATHY-GRIFFIN.jpg


oitnb-crazy-eyes-detained.jpg
 
Last edited:
They post all opinion pieces, as do all reputable major publications. CNN regularly posts conservative or alternative opinions, as does the Boston Globe and NY Times. I think it's called "fair and balanced".
 
yup. nothing at all suspicious about the timing of those posts.
Generally, a requirement for news is that it be topical. You're asserting that topical articles are "suspicious". Maybe they should wait until their opinion no longer matters before posting. Would that make you feel better?
 

If she said it (and meant it) as he portrayed it, it's an awful thing to have said, and reinforces the fact that people running for office will say anything. Of course, the only thing that could put a stop to that is the voters, and unfortunately, things have gone completely the wrong way in that regard.
 
So ... nothing?
What do you expect to do? In Canada, if every Canadian turned off their cars and factories and stopped breathing and produced 0 CO2 we would reduce the global output by about 1%. Or about an hours output of China. Seems pretty pointless for us to implement carbon taxes and kill our economy so China can put another coal fired power plant online.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
What do you expect to do? In Canada, if every Canadian turned off their cars and factories and stopped breathing and produced 0 CO2 we would reduce the global output by about 1%. Or about an hours output of China. Seems pretty pointless for us to implement carbon taxes and kill our economy so China can put another coal fired power plant online.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I still don't understand your argument. Both China and the US agreed to reduce emissions under the Paris agreement. How will the US leaving the agreement help anything?
 
I still don't understand your argument. Both China and the US agreed to reduce emissions under the Paris agreement. How will the US leaving the agreement help anything?
They agreed that reducing emissions would be a good thing. There are no penalties if either party fails to achieve what sounded good at the photo op. Have you observed any reductions or even hints at reductions from China?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
They agreed that reducing emissions would be a good thing. There are no penalties if either party fails to achieve what sounded good at the photo op. Have you observed any reductions or even hints at reductions from China?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not in a position to directly measure China's emissions. I've seen news that China has cancelled coal plants and is on schedule to beat their 2030 targets.

If the Paris Agreement has no teeth, why bother going through the process to leave it?
 
I'm not in a position to directly measure China's emissions. I've seen news that China has cancelled coal plants and is on schedule to beat their 2030 targets.

If the Paris Agreement has no teeth, why bother going through the process to leave it?
That is another question. I assume to score political points somewhere or distract from the various inquiry's and proceedings. Kind of a waste of time to me but not worth getting upset over if he does either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom