Political Talk Forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
uh oh, a populist did well in france today.

cue the articles!!!

How Russia hacked the French election – POLITICO

C-F1XmJUIAA_sNi.jpg:large
 
I have friends who think this is a big deal, but I don't. I think the whole uproar over political correctness, free speech, and opinion selection is made out to be a big thing by conservatives, but it's not. It's not policy, it doesn't jeopardize people's lives, it doesn't threaten our planet, it's not taking away our rights. All those things I just mentioned are really happening right now, but it has nothing to do with college campus speeches. This is a distraction by those who don't want to face reality.
 
I have friends who think this is a big deal, but I don't. I think the whole uproar over political correctness, free speech, and opinion selection is made out to be a big thing by conservatives, but it's not. It's not policy, it doesn't jeopardize people's lives, it doesn't threaten our planet, it's not taking away our rights. All those things I just mentioned are really happening right now, but it has nothing to do with college campus speeches. This is a distraction by those who don't want to face reality.
Ya having a flat out riot on campus every time a speaker comes the students don't agree with is no big deal at all.
 
I'm going to pass on your obviously hyperbolic overreaction, as you're demonstrating my point.

Currently neither the left or right will acknowledge that some of what the other side says has any merit. They just dismiss outright. There is no middle ground anymore.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Currently neither the left or right will acknowledge that some of what the other side says has any merit. They just dismiss outright. There is no middle ground anymore.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Was it ever any different? I look back through history and I can see people on the far right and far left who demonized each other and ignored common sense to promote their group's success. Maybe the extreme voices are just more amplified because of the internet. You used to have to read mimeographed pamphlets to find out what the extremists thought. Now they are in your news feed.

Blyons has a point. I'm all for protest and civil disobedience, but the violence displayed by some on the left is inexcusable.
 
Currently neither the left or right will acknowledge that some of what the other side says has any merit. They just dismiss outright.
That's another myth, like trickle-down economics. "They're both doing it". No. The only people who "dismiss outright" the opposing side are the people involved in the political propaganda machine. Everyone else is capable of forming an opinion on a given topic. If you present me with something being pushed by the right which has merit, I'll acknowledge it.
Was it ever any different?
Yes, very much so. Just look at the Reagan/Bush debate.
the violence displayed by some on the left is inexcusable.
Violence is always inexcusable, but it wasn't invented exclusively by either the left or the right.
 
Reagan/Bush debate? How will that shed light on the history of extremism?
Apparently you didn't see this played over and over during the most recent election. The two Republican candidates were expressing sentiments that were more to the left than today's democrats.
 
Apparently you didn't see this played over and over during the most recent election. The two Republican candidates were expressing sentiments that were more to the left than today's democrats.
But that isn't germane to what I'm saying. Neither Reagan nor Bush were extremists. Read some John Birch Society publications from the 1960s, or Weather Underground's "Prairie Fire" for examples of extremism.

I think the middle is still around, just like it always has been, but it doesn't have a lot to say, so what it says doesn't get amplified by the internet feedback loops.
 
But that isn't germane to what I'm saying. Neither Reagan nor Bush were extremists. Read some John Birch Society publications from the 1960s, or Weather Underground's "Prairie Fire" for examples of extremism.

I think the middle is still around, just like it always has been, but it doesn't have a lot to say, so what it says doesn't get amplified by the internet feedback loops.
What's germane is exactly what you just said. Neither Reagan or Bush were extremists, yet they represented the right wing in the 80s. John Birch was a fringe group - now that mindset is the modern right wing.
 
What's germane is exactly what you just said. Neither Reagan or Bush were extremists, yet they represented the right wing in the 80s. John Birch was a fringe group - now that mindset is the modern right wing.
That isn't what I'm saying. I'm suggesting the extremists are just more visible now, more amplified.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom