Who needs an interlopable radio?

Discussion in 'SiriusXM Soundwave Cafe' started by dZilla, Nov 14, 2008.

  1. dZilla

    dZilla Member

    Umm I don't even know if the term interlopable radio is correct.... ha ha, but who needs a radio that can play both stations?

    They can obviously send both stations to either type of listener XM or Sirius as they have combined many of the music channels? I don't get what the big hoop hoop was from before?

    Now were they concerned (pre merg) a Sirius AND Xm Subscriber getting their content on one machine?

    I don't get it...
     
  2. Audio Snob

    Audio Snob New Member

    Well it would be nice if they could use just one stream per channel and map both XM and Sirius receivers to tune to that stream instead of duplicating everything and using up twice the bandwidth.
     
  3. styckx

    styckx Member

    The whole merger is a sham. Anyone who buys one of those interoperable radios or dual subs anymore is just wasting their money. It's all beyond retarded
     
  4. IdRatherBeSkiing

    IdRatherBeSkiing This space for rent

    Or they have their portable and their car with different providers and are screwed.

    The interoperable radio will be offered as per FCC requirement. Then they will likely offer more radios on the system they will operate in 15 years and ignore the other one waiting for radios to become obsolete.
     
  5. Wolf

    Wolf Manspreading on DRC

    I was thinking about getting one down the road, but now since they merge quite a bit channels together, why bother now. Hell the next update in January, could possibly be more merging channels together?
     
  6. IdRatherBeSkiing

    IdRatherBeSkiing This space for rent

    The January merge will likely be channel numbers and maybe the talk channels (left/right on both services) as well as the traffic channels.
     
  7. Wolf

    Wolf Manspreading on DRC

    That would be cool, but less channels maybe better sound quality? But now since they merge are there supposedly to be new channels that both services never really had before?
     
  8. Supafly

    Supafly Member

    I thought a la carte was supposed to be setup where I could pick 50 channels I wanted to listen to for $6.99.

    I don't care if they merge Sirius with a pine tree as long as I don't have to pay $24? (2 subs) for the 4 or 5 channels I actually listen to.

    As for the radios. They could tell me the new ones magically make my pet gerbel orgasm for all I know about electronics.

    If they've got the witchcraft to set up my package to not recieve Playboy radio, than they've had the capability all along to choose specific channels I receive.
     
  9. Wolf

    Wolf Manspreading on DRC

    You can do that, but you have to get a Starmate 5 to do the ala carte.
     
  10. Supafly

    Supafly Member

    I think it's a way to sell new radios. If they can choose to not send me Playboy channel or send Best Of channels they've already got the capability to provide specific channels on my radio.

    At Sirius.com notice the a la carte pricing. $12.95 for 50 channels and Howard. Or $12.95 for 50 channels, Howard, and sports. Then $.25 for each additional channel. WTF? I can get all the channels now for $12.95.
     
  11. styckx

    styckx Member

    All I know is I will never buy a interlopable radio, but will consider possibly checking out a interoperable radio.
     
  12. I wish they would do Ala Carte for XM and other Sirius Radios. They said they would do Ala Carte for both service but so far it is only for Sirius. Not being able to use an older receiver forces you to pay $130 for a receiver than is not portable. I don't want to pay for channels I don't want. If they just offered 30 or say 50 channels in some Ala Carte Plan would be great. Why should we be paying for channels we don't like or don't care about. If they can block channels from you so you can't receive them it seems like they could do Ala Carte.
     
  13. me_rubin

    me_rubin Member

    That will never happen as long as Howard Stern is one of the channels. I doubt it would happen if you wanted baseball and football too!
     
  14. I was just thinking that myself. Why have it when most of the channels are shared between the two services now? I guess that those radio will go to the hardcores.
     
  15. JoeTan

    JoeTan Well-Known Member

    God dammit why can't they figure out something that makes sense????
     
  16. This is probably why Sirius and XM agree to the dual radio thing. Deep down they know that the channels were going to merge and the demand for this type of radio would be so low after this fact.
     
  17. Jaspear

    Jaspear New Member

    An interlopable radio is what we would have gotten if the merger had failed.

    :)
     
  18. edalen

    edalen Member

    Maybe, since the music channels have merged, we all now have interlopable radios. And the interoperable ones won't be needed. ;)
     

Share This Page