Stephen Stills

Bark

Bark

Hey Now!
Oct 15, 2008
2,412
493
83
Frederick, MD
I'm sorry, but I found this interview so boring, I had to tune out. Maybe it's because I was born over ten years after Woodstock, but the guy wasn't that compelling to me.

I'm curious what you guys thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: semipenguin
H

hyson

Forum Jerk
Oct 19, 2008
11,844
1,061
113
I heard some of it. I had a pretty hard time understanding the guy.

I flipped to Halloween radion on 126.
 
T

thekingofnicotine

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2009
2,523
54
48
What happened? I heard he was being a dick to Howard? Did Howard take a real call today after the interview where the caller blasted Stills?

I don't know why they had a hard-on for this guy. Who gives a shit about him.
 
S

Smok44

Member
Nov 19, 2008
196
5
18
Belmar, NJ
I love CSN&Y but Stills was sort of a dick today, he really didn't seem like he wanted to be there, also I thought he sounded horrible when he sang. Too bad it could have been a great guest, howard tried to get him going but Stills shut him down.
 
IronJabroni

IronJabroni

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2008
1,607
94
48
yeah, rough segment all around...dude wasn't having any of the psycho-analysis today
 
Ifandorbut

Ifandorbut

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2008
2,270
91
48
thekingofnicotin said:
Why have that old irrelevant fuck on the show anyway? Does anyone under 50 even give a shit about him?
Click to expand...

What a stupid comment.

Artimus Pyle, by your own standards, is an old irrelevant fuck, but the interview he did with Howard was great because Artimus had great stories to tell. Paul McCartney is a pretty old irrelevant fuck, but the first time he was on the show his interview was amazing.

I'm under 50, and although I can't say that I give a shit about Stephen Stills, I'm always willing to give a listen to what someone might have to say about their life or career, regardless of their age.
 
T

thekingofnicotine

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2009
2,523
54
48
Paul McCartney ain't irrelevant and the difference is he's willing to have fun with the interview and Stills wasn't.
 
Ifandorbut

Ifandorbut

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2008
2,270
91
48
thekingofnicotin said:
Paul McCartney ain't irrelevant and the difference is he's willing to have fun with the interview and Stills wasn't.
Click to expand...

You're changing the specs of what you wrote, that's very different than what you wrote originally.

By the way, even if someone isn't willing to "have fun" with an interview, it can still make for an interesting interview. That's where the interviewer gets to earn their money. I've always heard Gary, especially on the Wrap Up Show, say that Howard can make anyone interesting.
 
Wayne Edwards

Wayne Edwards

Active Member
Oct 13, 2008
456
36
28
Haven't heard the show yet (it awaits on my iPod for after work) but I remember a while back Stills was a guest on Alex Bennett's show (Sirius Left channel) and I couldn't believe how dull and monotone he sounded, like something was wrong with him. I remember at the time thinking he may have had brain damage due to previous drug abuse. I was so upset by this I immediately did a few bongloads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom