I cannot follow your reasoning for liking Maxwell's Silver Hammer. You like it because you hate the fans of the Beatles from an earlier period?
You like Ringo because Photograph is a great song? A song that was chiefly written by another Beatle, George Harrison?
Off topic to be sure, but an interesting reply and what that sheds a light on all things Jgatie.
I like
Maxwell's Silver Hammer because people who were into the Beatles didn't like it. I thought it was brilliantly off-beat and strange, so un-Beatle like. Beatle fans expected Day in the Life, and got a quirky tune about a murderer, and didn't know how to deal with it.
I like
Photograph because George wrote it. I also like
Here Comes the Sun. They should have let George do more. I personally prefer his solo stuff to either John's or Paul's. Plus, he was a Wilbury. John and Paul could never be Wilburys, too much ego. I always liked Ringo because he's probably the least talented of the group, but he had the balls to piss the rest of them off by going solo first.
But my main complaint about the Beatles is they were basically a pop group with good marketing. They were massively talented, but they were also carefully packaged for mass consumption, unlike my preferred band from the era, The Rolling Stones. My frigging parents liked the Beatles, but my mom wouldn't let a Stones album in the house.
"Controversy" from the Beatles was comparing themselves to Jesus and denying
Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds was code for LSD. Meanwhile, the Stones are firing guitarists who then drown, appearing as Satan at Altamont, and writing drug songs with "coded" titles like
Sister Morphine. That's not mass consumption, that's a fuck you to society. It's easy to see why I gravitate to that. Plus, they were as talented, if not more talented than the Beatles.