After listening Moody talk about the Labonte/Said shenanigans that will take place this weekend i got to thinking about something. For those that missed it I'll recap. It appears that past champ Terry Labonte is listed as a driver this weekend at Watkins Glen. It also appears that he will attempt to qualify and if does not make it will use that past champ provisional to guarantee entry into the race. It also appears that once he makes it in that a driver change to Boris Said will take place on that car. All this to me has WRONG written all over it, but alas is allowed within the current rules.
So my thoughts led to this question. Should the past champions provisional be eternal, permanent and forever? Using the same strategy that Labonte is using what is stopping the King or Dale Jarret from qualifying *cough* a car and using that provision to get an up and coming star in a race? I think that the past champs provision should be applied to drivers that have driven X number of races in the last 24 months. That factor of X should be at least 10 but not more than 20.
Discuss.
So my thoughts led to this question. Should the past champions provisional be eternal, permanent and forever? Using the same strategy that Labonte is using what is stopping the King or Dale Jarret from qualifying *cough* a car and using that provision to get an up and coming star in a race? I think that the past champs provision should be applied to drivers that have driven X number of races in the last 24 months. That factor of X should be at least 10 but not more than 20.
Discuss.