Boycott this restaurant! - Page 4

**TSS Taylor** · #31 11-10-2011, 01:19 PM

I've since Canceled my November trip to Cascade Twp, Michigan. NEVER AGAIN!!

JHDKoopman · #32 11-10-2011, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyson

Even though I disagree with most of this, here is what the ADA says about service animals:
ADA Business Brief: Service Animals

i applaud u for seeing both sides.

and i can understand not wanting a dog or any hairy shedding animal around where my food is prepared.

memebag · #33 11-10-2011, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyson

Being in a public setting aleviates the immediate need to have the dog, much unlike a "Seeing Eye Dog".

I agree with the restaraunteer here. The dog should be banned.

If the dog is banned, then the dude is banned. He can't just leave the dog home when he's going to Don Julio's, and he isn't going to leave the dog in the lobby. The dog goes with him everywhere, so restaurants have to let the dog in. It's as simple as that.

hyson · #34 11-10-2011, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memebag

If the dog is banned, then the dude is banned. He can't just leave the dog home when he's going to Don Julio's, and he isn't going to leave the dog in the lobby. The dog goes with him everywhere, so restaurants have to let the dog in. It's as simple as that.

What's the point of the dog? No, seriously, please answer.

memebag · #35 11-10-2011, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyson

What's the point of the dog? No, seriously, please answer.

Seizure alert dogs let their owners know a seizure is coming, sometimes as much as 30 minutes in advance. Seizure response dogs alert other people their owner is having a seizure and protect their owner from harm during a seizure.

You can find out more on the internet.

hyson · #36 11-10-2011, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memebag

Seizure alert dogs let their owners know a seizure is coming, sometimes as much as 30 minutes in advance.

If this is the case, then I'll concede my point that the dog should have been banned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by memebag

Seizure response dogs alert other people their owner is having a seizure and protect their owner from harm during a seizure.

If a seizure occurs, while in a public setting, people will already know. The addition of the dog is not needed to diagnose the condition. It's basically cutting out the middle man. A medical alert bracelet would do fine.

memebag · #37 11-10-2011, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyson

If this is the case, then I'll concede my point that the dog should have been banned.

And if you don't concede your point, are you OK with saying the dude is banned from restaurants that don't allow service animals?

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyson

If a seizure occurs, while in a public setting, people will already know.

They might, or they might not. Seizures don't all look like someone flopping around on the floor foaming at the mouth. Part of why they have seizure response dogs is that bystanders can't tell a seizure is happening.

Why are you so opposed to seizure service dogs?

hyson · #38 11-10-2011, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memebag

And if you don't concede your point, are you OK with saying the dude is banned from restaurants that don't allow service animals?

They might, or they might not. Seizures don't all look like someone flopping around on the floor foaming at the mouth. Part of why they have seizure response dogs is that bystanders can't tell a seizure is happening.

Why are you so opposed to seizure service dogs?

Yes, I'm perfectly fine with the guy being banned. Eff him! He has a god damn dog with him. Not everyone is a dog person nor should they be subjected to any dog related issues. It's not fair. Let's say a lady at the next table over has an abnormal fear of dogs and becomes hypertense? Ooops, too bad.

Why are you so for it?

I think the ADA Bill is a piece of shit that allows too many scum bags take FULL advantage of it.

I think a business owner should have every right to disallow a dog, cat, monkey, iguana, etc from his or her business. It's a private business and should have the discretion.

I don't like the Government dictating who can and cannot patronize my business.

Wolf · #39 11-10-2011, 06:52 PM

There no Don Julio's here in Phoenix, so I don't need to worry about that restaurant. If the dog is well behaved, I could see it staying. But still, restaurants are for humans not pets. So I could agree not allowing the dog in the dinning area, unless it was a service dog, which those should be allowed. If the owner has a job, he or she can live the dog home everyday for several hours. Come on it not that hard to leave the dog home alone for couple of hours, while you eat out!

memebag · #40 11-10-2011, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyson

Yes, I'm perfectly fine with the guy being banned. Eff him! He has a god damn dog with him. Not everyone is a dog person nor should they be subjected to any dog related issues. It's not fair. Let's say a lady at the next table over has an abnormal fear of dogs and becomes hypertense? Ooops, too bad.

Why are you so for it?

Compassion for other humans, I suppose, built on enlightened self interest. If I had a seizure disorder, I'd want the same kindness extended to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyson

I think the ADA Bill is a piece of shit that allows too many scum bags take FULL advantage of it.

I think a business owner should have every right to disallow a dog, cat, monkey, iguana, etc from his or her business. It's a private business and should have the discretion.

I don't like the Government dictating who can and cannot patronize my business.

So you're cool with segregated movie theaters, swimming pools and the like? "Non-seizing Only" signs?