
01-08-2010, 09:03 AM
|
 |
Confused
|
|
Join Date: 10-12-2008
Location: New York
Posts: 6,023
Rep Power: 134
|
|
HD signals run at a very small fraction of the power of the main analog signal.
That's the compromise that had to be made in order to allow the analog and digital signals to co-exist on the same frequency.
The FCC and NPR are experimenting with increasing the power of digital signals. However, it seems that so far, adding too much more power to the digital signal starts to cause interference on adjacent channels. So the bottom line is that it might get a little better, but not too much.
Also, some stations are not in a big hurry to get their digital signals back on the air if there are problems. It's just not a high priority in many cases. Engineering staffs are already stretched, and the analog signals are the money makers (and thus the main priority).
Radio, like the rest of the world, needs to deal with the move to digital from analog.
HD radio, as it was executed, is a poorly executed concept. I realize that something had to be done about the millions of existing analog receivers, but maybe a new "digital only" band with a 10 year transition window would have been a better solution.
If possible, try an outdoor antenna.
__________________
DRC Photo Contest #3 - Winner
|